Perhaps it is not good science
Let me just clear up a few little points. First I have a different opinion to the use and usefulness of CERN as an instrument of science to the mainstream of the scientific community.
Second when looking at the installation as a large, a very large piece of equipment it is more bound by the laws of general relativity than quantum mechanics.
My personal opinion is that by using the rubber sheet analogy and ring singularity concept of extreme energy in a near absolute zero environment is that it is an excellent way to generate the required negative energy needed to form a rather large worm hole.
So while it would be an awfully expensive loss of a very big piece of equipment and highly trained personnel it would in fact be a tremendous leap forward as far as adding to the sum of knowledge as taught by the scientific principle.
My main concern if that does happen is what ever became of all those little unexplained energy losses on file and what to do about them. On the plus side of the equation is of course the incredibly deep and blue lake that France will be able to share with Switzerland.
__________________
"Nature is obliged to let reality determine its laws, whereas mathematics is under no such constraint."
|