And shouldn't we have seen increases in earthquake activity along other resevoirs that are on or near fault lines?

What is the relative mass of a filled resevoir compaired to that of the plate, and the force required to move said plate?

And the fact that the quake occured in an area that has had regular and documented quake activity, that occured not only within the expeted timeframe but within expected magnitude (even if higher than "average")... That's like me saying "I have a grandfather clock that chimes every night at midnight. Last night, I put a new lightbulb in the bathroom light fixture. The clock chimed at midnight. The extra power drawn through the lightbulb must have caused a surge that resulted in the clock chiming."

__________________

I'm like one of those idiot savants...well, except for the savant part.
"In order to increase awareness of the homeless, security have been given binoculars."