View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 14-May-2008, 04:22 PM
stutefish stutefish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 829
Default

Welcome to BAUT, Richard. I think you will find many members here who are qualified to consider the technical merits of your claim, and willing to challenge your claims on scientific and mathematical grounds.

I am not one of them (being unqualified in the technical aspects of your claims).

I do, however, have a more "historical" question, related to the quoted passage below:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Holle View Post
All of the conclusions I have reached are a result of reading scientific research, and continuing on past the point where lack of further funding stopped the original researchers. It is not so much a "new paradigm" just a composite of research that was discontinued, for lack of funding...
You cite a lack of funding as the reason this research was previously discontinued. Could you tell us a little bit about the amount of funds that would have been necessary to continue the research, the amount by which the original researchers fell short, the reasons given for why their funding was discontinued and the source(s) of funding you found with which to continue this research?

Thanks in advance!