View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 15-May-2008, 12:49 PM
01101001's Avatar
01101001 01101001 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 10,749
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samkent View Post
"and a wheeled vehicle under meters of dry ice isn't useful."

I doubt a lander under meters of dry ice would be much use either.
Of course, but it's far cheaper. It will be a long, long time before someone invests in a polar rover that has such a short potential drive. It will happen eventually. The time is not now.

Quote:
Originally Posted by samkent View Post
It sounds like they already know it's there so is the mission justified?

Picture this. Day two after the landing ...

They dig a hole and scoop the soil into the experiment chamber 1. Turn on the equipment and bingo! positive for water ice.

Is there a point to continue with the mission? Should they dig a second hole 4 feet from the first? I wonder what they would find? Duh maybe water ice???
Duh. Have you read Phoenix Mission objectives and methods? It doesn't match your scenario.
__________________
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0....
Reply With Quote