Quote:
Originally Posted by tdvance
A picky technicality, but he was found "not guilty" rather than "innocent"--the verdict is "not guilty" specifically because it means he wasn't proven guilty, not that he was proven innocent.
On the other hand, the lawsuit afterward resolved on the decision that he did it. He's not guilty but he did it is the courts' rulings.
|
Supposedly the amount of evidence that was not presented in court was quite a bit. During the civil suit when all the evidence was presented they found him guilty. I think it is beyond a reasonable doubt that OJ legally got away with a double murder.