But then that's based on the correctness of cosmological theory that assumes just the action of the known forces. Whereas above I've already pointed to quite a lot of reasons in support of a theory that a cause acts nonlocally in addition to the forces and that is derived from the evidence of quantum mechanics.

These reaons including the fact that no dark matter has been directly detected after over two decades of experimentation; that while MOND is more accurate at explaining galaxy rotation curves it doesn't make sense as a theory; that there is a problem in explaining how matter could concentrate so as to form the first stars in protogalaxies.

And then also, although it seems that cosmologists are reluctant to admit it, a key cosmological theory could be wrong. So that the WMAP and other evidence indicates that the universe is not isotropic, as predicted by inflation theory, but has an axis or preferred direction. In which case the early universe seeding theory for the formation of galaxies, which requires cosmic inflation, would also be wrong.

So my general argument is that a consistent cosmologal theory has yet to be developed because existing quantum theory does not provide a causal explanation for quantum mechanics.