Quote:
Originally Posted by Fortis
So we are considering two options here:
1) The theory of GR is applicable to this scenario, and not only predicted the phenomena, but also predicted the actual numerical value of the deflection prior to any observation.
2) The phenomena is described by some other theory (yours), which is so far unable to even correctly derive any numerical value, nevermind being able to predict the value before the measurement was taken.
On balance, which of these two options do you believe is most likely to be correct.  |
niether ( just kidding !! )
look , while Einstien used the mathematics of geometry to predict this or that behaviour by planets , this tells us nothing , of the physical dynamics which caused this behaviour in the first place which is my point
look space-time was invented in the context of geometric mathematics and was not meant to explain any of the physical dynamics between objects
this is understandable since in geometric mathematics both space and time can be expressed mathematically. what else did they have to go on really ?