Quote:
Originally Posted by john hunter
Dear Michael,
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Noonan
Where do you put the balance point between light being emitted and rescaling to a larger less energetic frame and matter in a later time frame receiving light rescaled to a larger frame where it requires a more energetic light to see it in the correct frame?
|
Can you explain what you mean please?
John H. |
Hello
john hunter,
I have that effect on people. Do you support the adding of space to assist the explanation of some red shift or fully covered by a rescale of matter?
The reason I ask is that expansion is seemingly far greater in the voids and so a minor rescale of matter and a major rescale of space if some sort of asymmetry point could be determined gives a greater longevity to the system.
There is an abundance of space within matter and the example I have heard is if the proton is the size of an orange the electron would be about a mile away so I am not struggling with that aspect.
The adding of space in any form would indicate increasing the spread of energy and thereby lowering the frequency giving a redshift. Pure rescaling indicates a matter only solution. A combination rescale of space without adding to space (yes it is the aether concept) greater than matter rescale means the same force would achieve the effect. It would require that matter reacts less than space.
It would also change gravity as larger matter using the inverse squared rules would explain how the dinosaurs might have been able to sustain such size due to not incurring such weight penalties.
Michael