View Single Post
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-June-2008, 06:34 PM
trinitree88 trinitree88 is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 3,162
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Halcyon Dayz View Post
Yeah, sure...

Using the word Aether might not have been the smart thing to do then.
Nowadays it just pushes the must-be-woo button with most physicists.

And for good reason.
Halcyon Dayz. One must remember that Asimov discussed the four correct physical interpretations of the negative result of the Michelson-Morley experiment in the late 70"s in his book, titled I believe''On Physics"...a blue Hardcover. Only one of the four interpretations was that there is no "ether". The others were to the effect that it was there but was of such a nature that a M-M experiment would not show it for various principle reasons.
So if people jump to "woo" they need to read a bit. To date I've found one typo in all his works. pete.
__________________
A third rate theory forbids.
A second rate theory explains after the fact.
A first rate theory predicts.
A. Lomonosov