Then apparently you did not read to section 11, where you question was answered in detail. Please read section 11 and tell me if you can now understand how the neutron can be quantified as a bound electron and proton and be fully consistent with physical observations.

In a court of law the conclusion is not drawn until the facts are presented. How much of the theory have you studied, so far? When you have learned the basic geometrical structure of the Aether and subatomic particles, the conservation of area, how the force constants are driven by the Gforce, and the more advanced concepts of spiralled dimension geometry, then you'll be at the present cutting edge of understanding parity that I am.

I do not claim to have total knowledge of all that can be known about quantum geometry, but I do claim to have more knowledge about quantum geometry than you do at the moment. You are asking questions unrelated to the theory that is presented. My present claim of what I DO know is that which I have written about. Judging me for what I don't know or haven't had time to fully investigate is unprofessional.

Let's stay on topic. The Aether Physics Model is the theory that is presented. It includes a Unified Force Theory, an electron binding energy formula, quantum dimensional analysis, two types of charges, distributed charge correction, and an analysis of magnetic moment, all which is unique to the theory and claims to be scientifically correct. There is plenty of material for us to be discussing, which is relevant to the discussion. Let's not go off topic to theories that I have not presented.

You asked for me to develop an idea about parity, which was a curiosity for you. I did. I also stated it was not something I have worked out to the very end. That should be sufficient for your question at this time.

Dave