Quote:
Originally Posted by astromark
So tell me Dave,...When did the passage of time become an illusion.?
|
It never *became* an illusion. That would imply time existed in reality at some point.
Quote:
|
I must have missed something.
|
It was probably the paper. Have you read it yet?
Quote:
|
and please do not quote me when responding...
|
There is a reason why the ability to use QUOTE tags was provided in the first place. Please do quote me when responding. I am involved with discussions on dozens of lists simultaneously. It helps me to quickly focus on the discussion at hand and reduces confusion.
[/QUOTE]Do not interpret my question as a rebuff... I want you to explain more.[/QUOTE] If you want me to explain more, you need to ask a specific question. For example, point to the specific section in the paper where time was presented as an illusion and then either pick apart my presentation, or ask for clarification about it. Don't pick a sentence out of one of my replies to someone else if you have not done the basic research behind the discussion. We are discussing my theory, not my discussion about the theory.
Quote:
|
Having also noted the mention of other dimensions, is troubling me also.
|
Am I your psychotherapist? I think not. If you do not understand something, then study the paper. If the paper is not providing you with the clarification you are looking for, then try putting clarification into your question. If I understand where the logic is not working for you, I can probably fill in the gaps. The paper explains dimensions in detail.
Dave