View Single Post
  #58 (permalink)  
Old 10-June-2008, 01:27 PM
speedfreek's Avatar
speedfreek speedfreek is online now
Established Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: London, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,081
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by damian1727 View Post
works properly ???ideal laws of physics???

lets just keep open minds and rely on science to let us know what we know and be big enough to know what we dont

you sound as if you think further investigation is not worth it

folk always put something called god into gaps in knowlege....so what?

lets push the gaps back

ultimatley you seem to be asking the ancient question WHY SOMETHING AND NOT NOTHING?

for now i live with the fact that NOTHING is unstable and liable to fracture into something the fact that this question is along way away from being know should not stop us thinking

Damian, it was you who introduced the fine-tuning problem into this thread, and once this has been introduced, it sends the discussion tumbling inevitably towards the "why something and not nothing" question.

I was just suggesting a number of alternative possible solutions to the fine-tuning problem, but all they do is push the question further away - the question is still there, lurking!

Now, dcl is happy to leave the question unanswered, and I tend to agree with him, but I see no problem in investigating further if you want, which is why I mentioned things like M-Theory and Loop Quantum Gravity. M-Theory allows multiple universes ('branes bang together and cause universes), and Loop Quantum Gravity allows a sort of cyclical universe (no big-bang, but a previous contracting universe).
Reply With Quote