I did not start this post, make no claims, have no need to defend.
They why are you defending? Why do you care what we say?
Knock off the passive-aggressive approach. It's really getting old.
I just suggest that she takes a science minded approach, which many authors clearly do not.
But you aren't sure what a "science-minded approach" might be. Remember that you told us your knowledge of scientific method was limited.
If you have an opinion, make it an informed one...
...says the admitted non-scientist trying to tell everyone that a certain person's work is scientific-minded. BAUT's readership is generally not a group you can easily accuse of being poorly informed.
|