That is a matter of opinion.
No it isn't. You simply deny the logical analysis of your work. As I've repeatedly said: illogic is as it is.
And I posted reference to her work and not mine.
You told us this was the work of a well educated person, whom you believe approached the subject with appropriate scientific rigor. I assume you believed this would appeal to a skeptical audience. Turns out this person's education had nothing to do with the work you ask us to consider, and in fact nothing to do with science. (PhD degrees in literature do not generally require a scientific method.) Turns out this person left academia to pursue "woo-woo" topics full time, and was successful at it.
That was your basis of recommending this author's work among all others. But now there's a serious doubt for that basis; you misled us. And so the worthiness of further attention to it is now the question.
But now you change horses and demand it simply be taken at face value.
You urge us to inform ourselves. I suggest you take your own advice and inform yourself on the credibility and qualifications of your sources before you undertake to advocate them.
|