Any sufficietly advanced technology. This precludes any physical evidence of proof...
Appeal to magic, and blatantly circular.
Many voices as eyewitness accounts, research papers and published books, with a long documented history, makes a phenomena.
Documenting a repeated effect does not substantiate a hypothesized cause. You demonstrate no understanding whatsoever about how science works.
Science isn't just some religion with arbitrary rules. Science is the body of understanding we've acquired into how, when, and by modes of reasoning a defensible and substantial conclusion may be drawn. The acquisition of that understanding occurs by trial and error. Repeating the known errors simply because they give you the answers you want doesn't constitute a valid dissenting opinion.
|