You really hate science, don't you. It takes away all your toys.

Wrong, I love science. Hate it that science is in denial, or is that just for public denial. I would bet the phenomena is in very serious classified study. The defense implecations are too big to ignore.

Of what?

Good question. Unfounded fears = paranoia.

In her case, motivation to research. Having a phd in english did not qualify her for research in physics. The act of obtaining that phd gave her the tools and methodology for conducting research. She researched the human and emotional aspects of the phenomena.

Established that it was not unfounded paranoia. Established that psycic and new age philosophy of the abduction phenomena was a form of denial and wishful thinking.

Doesn't matter; it's just not science.

Documentation by journal has a long established historical presedence in scientific study. Darwin kept one.

Nor is there any reason to attribute it to imaginary space invaders, which is what is being done. You forget that part. Not only did she write about her experiences, she wrote about what the aliens are going to do to us. Horror! Makes for a pretty gripping story.

Wrong. She did not claim alien. Clearly stated there was no proof as to source. Also made no predictions of what they were going to do. She documented what was being done. She dispelled the notion of applying purpose or intent, stated the facts as she found them in blunt reality of action.

You don't consider the possibility at all that she's just making it all up to get attention.

No I do not. She just didn't fit that profile.


I did not post this to get into a long discussion of merit. Expected exactly the response that I got. Obviously you continue to post from position of judgement according to your paradeim.

Have you actually read her work?

Did you actually listen to her lecture?

At least listen to the lecture in its entirety. Two hours well spent. Then you can have a reasonable assesment of value. Your arguments against will have a ring of validity.

At this point you sound like a computer program incapable of considering anything outside of programming. Argument by rote. Do you write those documents the government uses to deny? The evidence suggest they take it very seriously in secret. It is public denial that counts.

And yes, people like Karla Turner have convinced me that there is indeed a denial at work. Did not feel that way when I embarqued on this journey of discovery. Now I do. This aspect went from a possibility to a necessity for me. They have to.

Reading her work I was saying hmm, maybe. Watched her lecture and decided her demeaner and assessments were hard cold fact, devoid of spiritual interpretation many like to apply. The spiritual aspect others applied frankly irretated me.

Do not see it as a horror story for good reading. See it as an application of our own morality. Absolute power does corrupt absolutly. And so does technology so superior that the purveyers of such are elevated to absolute power.

Love science. Believe that one day we will have enough to put our foot down and dictate our own terms.