Wrong again but not worth the nitpicking of detail.
I disagree. If your speculation on your critics' motives is to continue to be used as a means of side-stepping their actual arguments and dealing with their content, then your rhetorical approach here is indeed on-topic.
Please explain why you've followed the same major pattern of argumentation here as you did in both the alien ship on the moon topic and the aerial sightings topic. Reconcile it with your stated motive simply to acquire answers. You tried to paint me as paranoid for seeing that pattern, yet I've shown how you just did it again by retreating from Turner's conclusions back to the general topic.
Now I am the one who wants answers, and the question is what you really intend to achieve by posting at BAUT. Your answer will determine how much further attention I determine is worth paying to you.
|