Your analysis is interestig however since it is of ancedotal evidence which your reject as being possible to evaluate scientificly then your evaluation has no more validity than mine.
You have absolutely no clue what you're talking about. Do you honestly think that throwing together a word salad of things you've heard other people say before really constitutes an argument?
Further you have an established bias that the subject is non existant...
Correctly noting that there is no proof for the existence of space aliens is not a bias. Believing (in the absence of any evidence) that space aliens do visit Earth and are responsible for symptoms alleged or reported by so-called abductees, is.
Much of my statements are summary of actual research by KT...
You disavowed Karla Turner. You may no longer use her as a reference unless you plan to change your answers to my questions regarding the validity of her work.
...and others so it is not just my unsuported thoughts.
Here goes the backpedalling again. When you take others to task for not agreeing with the claims, you make those claims your own. You may not absolve yourself of such arrogance by simply naming the people whose claims you mindlessly repeat.
Since you have ruled out anything but physical evedence being applicable to analysis then any conclusions made by you are baseless.
What conclusions made by me are you talking about? I'm simply reminding you that your conclusions regarding the motives and actions of space aliens are highly dependent on evidence for the existence of space aliens in the first place, which has not been provided. You want to cross the finish line before you've even finished lacing up your running shoes.
I just read project Bluebook special report...
Changing the subject.
Again it is all ancedotal evidence so I will concede any argument on that basis.
You concede, but then you turn around and argue. Make up your mind.
I find all of your arguments of scientific value do little to convince those who have actually seen one.
What makes you think I'm trying to convince them? What makes you think they can be persuaded otherwise by any means?
You are quite knowlegable and I have learned a great deal here. It would be remiss of me not to consider your arguments at lenght so I plan to spend the next week or so following the links on critical thinking I was given here.
Thanks. I'll just be happy if you stop calling me biased and a government shill.
|