I don't think the dabate is winnable in this biased forum and so do not seek a win.
It is not a case of "winning" a debate. It is a case of solid argumentation. Actually, you should be grateful to having your theory stress-tested. Try and take it in a positive fashion. None of us like having our theories come under attack, but if you are truly looking for truth, be grateful for the members of this forum, especially Jay, for forcing you to think logically and thoroughly. What you gain ultimately from this exercise is up to you. The easy way out is to dismiss the feedback as coming from a "biased" forum. Another way is to really lean back and consider dispassionately the feedback. You might still remain unconvinced, but you will understand the problem others have with your viewpoint.


If the aliens exist and abduct then my logic is valid.
If they do not then my hypothesis is smoke.

This was mentioned around the beginning of the debate: prove the ETH, then it can be investigated in respect to other phenomena: alien abduction, crop circles, etc. You elected not to do so, but rather selected the alien abduction path (and stated specifically "alien implants" as the testable proof) to prove the ETH, which is heavily contested as being the valid way to do it in this forum.