View Single Post
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 27-June-2008, 09:10 PM
Chris Hillman Chris Hillman is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 353
Arrow Happens to the best of us

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tobin Dax View Post
And Chris, thanks for the correct calculation. I was working too fast last night.
But you got us started on some pretty interesting stuff.

I guess only KenG read my thread on Schubert calculus and how enumerative geometry relates to superstring theory (I haven't actually gotten to that last part yet!).

As an example of the interconnectedness of mathematics, you probably wouldn't guess that the stuff I discuss there about Grassmannians has any relationship with quantum calculus, but it does.

Search John Baez's column This Weeks Finds for a long riff on reflection groups, Coxeter/Dynkin diagrams, semi-simple Lie groups, parabolic subgroups, cohomology of flag manifolds, and more, in which among many other things he used quantum calculus to compute the vector space strucuture of the cohomology ring of a flag manifold (generalization of a Grassmannian). John has discussed many wonderful things, but this was my all time favorite :smile:

(I've been trying to get him to explain the generalization of what I said about the ring structure to general flag manifolds...)

To search his website: try the nifty search bar at upper right on his home page. Years ago, I learned from Dornfest et al. Google Hacks, O'Reilly, 3rd Edition, 2006 how to make a search bar, and passed the trick on to John. My one contribution to mathematical physics :wink:

Fourier transforms: this wonderful topic has been greatly generalized to harmonic analysis, a topic which unifies many ideas from representation theory, operator theory, and theory of PDEs. Applications extend to dynamical systems and analytic number theory. "Harmonics" appear as eigenfunctions of certain linear operators on function spaces (often, partial differential operators such as the Laplace operator), and the general idea is to decompose general functions in our function space into a "sum" of harmonics.

Just a tiny hint of how HUP arises naturally in pure math: it turns out that in operator theory, two natural operators are multiplication by x, written f -> M_x f and differentiation wrt x, f -> D_x f. These two operators do not commute: D_x M_x f = f(x) + M_x D_x f for all functions, so we have

D_x M_x - M_x D_x = I

where I is the identity operator. This is the starting point for learning about the Weyl algebra.

(In symbolic dynamics this is reformulated using shift operators, which suggests, correctly, a connection with tiling dynamical systems such as the space of Penrose tilings.)

Some suggested reading:

For the formulation of the HUP as Just Another Inequality in L^p spaces :wink:
see problem 32, section 6.3, in my favorite real analysis text:
Gerald B. Folland,
Real Analysis,
Wiley, 1984.

See two old and fairly brief posts by myself on two vast, vast topics:and see references therein.

A Wikipedia article I only skimmed but it seems OK (the anon is from UofC) is Weyl algebra. Did I mention that the cohomology of Grassmannians has something to do with polynomial rings?

An old but superb exposition of harmonic analysis is
Kenneth I. Gross,
On the Evolution of Noncommutative Harmonic Analysis.
American Mathematical Monthly, Vol. 85, No. 7, 525-548. Aug. - Sep., 1978.
Prof. Gross won the Chauvenet Prize for this paper. Those of you with access to a university library should be able to easily find it on your library shelves, or if your uni is wealthy, at JSTOR. An earlier Chauvenet Prize paper, by Guido Weiss, is a fine introduction to complex methods in fourier transforms.

A fascinating expository post by--- no, darnitall, there be cranks here, I don't want them to go spam his blog with woo. I'll try to remember to PM the link.

Victor Kac and Pokman Cheung.
Quantum Calculus.
Springer, 2002.

Richard Kane,
Reflection Groups and Invariant Theory.
CMS, 2001.

See this stillborn thread if you want to discuss the sampling theorem and what information theory says about HUP.

Cover and Thomas,
Elements of Information Theory.
Wiley, 1991.
(The best of dozens of fine textbooks on information theory, IMO, if only because it gives some impression of the vast reach of Shannon's creation.)
__________________
Chris Hillman

Read these PF posts. Avoid Wikipedia--- except for these versions. Read this and this suggested sticky. When asked for advice, I always say: never take advice!

Last edited by Chris Hillman; 27-June-2008 at 10:34 PM.. Reason: Mention shift operators
Reply With Quote