Thread: Fusion
View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 07-July-2008, 02:38 PM
GOURDHEAD GOURDHEAD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,180
Default

In the description of the sun given in http://www.nineplanets.org/sol.html , the energy output is given as:
Quote:
The Sun's energy output (3.86e33 ergs/second or 386 billion billion megawatts) is produced by nuclear fusion reactions. Each second about 700,000,000 tons of hydrogen are converted to about 695,000,000 tons of helium and 5,000,000 tons (=3.86e33 ergs) of energy in the form of gamma rays. As it travels out toward the surface, the energy is continuously absorbed and re-emitted at lower and lower temperatures so that by the time it reaches the surface, it is primarily visible light. For the last 20% of the way to the surface the energy is carried more by convection than by radiation.
These values seem plausible and they describe a powerful fusion energy plant. A fusion plant of whatever size will have to have its energy harnessed by some interfacing equipment to get the power in usable form. I suggest we take the fusion plant nature has provided and work on harnessing its energy which seems more easily obtained than building a fusion device from scratch.

The implication from the description is that fusion produces energy primarily in the form of gamma rays (I had assumed that it was scattered across a larger bandwidth) which are exceedingly difficult to confine/shield and this will add to the difficulty of the design of less powerful fusion devices. I'm not a fan of fusion power (except as produced in stars) for interstellar transportation.
__________________
For those inclined to oppose human meddling with the structure of the universe or the composition and configuration of objects and groups of objects within the universe, consider:
Whether there is a limit to the magnitude of a modulation of chaos below which order remains invariant? Or, is order but a fiction invented by perspectives applied over finite, however large, time intervals?
Reply With Quote