View Single Post
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 31-July-2008, 03:16 PM
NEOWatcher's Avatar
NEOWatcher NEOWatcher is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: the E(e)rie coast
Posts: 9,968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicolas View Post
Not to sound all woowoo, but if I'm correct there's been quite a lot of military spy sats very similar to Hubble.
Not being an expert...

I'm sure there are many similarities between them, since some of the functions and problems are virtually the same.
But; the Hubble goes beyond this because it is not a single purpose scope. Even if it were not built with servicability in mind, there is still a lot more instrumentation for a wider range observations.

Nova also mentioned that the mirror was the largest one ever in space. I doubt that something of this nature scales up in a linear fashion. So, even if the design were the same but bigger, the cost would be vastly larger.

"Based on" is a tricky phrase. It can imply both structure and concept, and can imply various levels of "sameness".

On thing that Nova made a point in thier introduction was the public outcry made in opposition of a Hubble retirement. (they said I think) Never was there such a public reaction to a space mission. Yes; other missions may have been historically bigger and more in the news and the public eye, but they didn't invoke this type of reaction.
So; this caused some re-thinking of ways to save it that weren't in it's design.
__________________
Numbers are not case sensitive. (me)
Reply With Quote