Wow. I found this article in Nature.

I am now very surprised there is still the head long rush to fire this machine up. The latest information is now in that the model for physics is wrong and the Higgs does not exist at roughly 170 GeV and that is confirmed by TeVatron a Fermilab particle accelerator.

What do you call a person who says perhaps we should take a closer look at what is happening now that there is something slightly amiss with the very basics of the science being used in a machine of such power?

CERN scientists gave an unequivocal guarantee that if anything was slightly amiss the project would stop until a proper solution could be found. Is this commitment to safety now going to be honored?