View Single Post
  #37 (permalink)  
Old 11-August-2008, 08:38 PM
ngc3314's Avatar
ngc3314 ngc3314 is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 87.5W 33.2N
Posts: 1,713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nicolas View Post
It is indeed more "similar" than "close to identical": these KH-11 spy sats have a mirror of 2.3m rather than 4m. So that alone implies a total redesign for Hubble.
Hubble is 2.4m - the existence of facilities to make space optics close to that size factored into the cost of the project. (It is widely rumored that there are now orbiting systems close to 4m in aperture, not even counting ESA's upcoming Herschel far-IR mission). The guidance and instrument packages would have been quite different - reconnaissance needs precise pointing, but assuredly not the ability to maintain pointing at the milliarcsecond level for hours (before launch, many of us thought this would be the major hurdle). Also, it turns out (according to some folks who claim to know, anyway) that inteligence satellites deliberately spend a a lot of time in "safe mode" anyway between taskings, which is what HST operations try very hard to avoid.
Reply With Quote