View Single Post
  #591 (permalink)  
Old 21-August-2008, 02:43 PM
HenrikOlsen's Avatar
HenrikOlsen HenrikOlsen is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denmark 55.6773° N 12.3610° E
Posts: 8,775
Send a message via MSN to HenrikOlsen Send a message via Yahoo to HenrikOlsen
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Noonan View Post
Quantum science ‘assumes’ no time for particles because it makes a mess of the mathematics.
Sorry, that's just plain wrong.

Time is just as fundamental to quantum theories as to relativity, and some quantum effects (eg. neutron decay) can be used to demonstrate the time dilation effects from relativity (fast moving neutrons decay slower in a way that is consistent with GR).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Noonan View Post
So even though a proton is very small it is still matter and not a particle.
Looks like you're using a non-standard definition of the word particle, by the standard definition it is a particle.

Quote:
There is something FUNDAMENTALLY WRONG with the scientific communities understanding of matter.
There is something FUNDAMENTALLY WRONG with your understanding of matter and particles and quantum physics and....
__________________
‘To those who regard “crime fiction” as some sacred icon which must follow a rigid formula, I will always be the man who writes 18-syllable haiku.’
Andrew Vachss, Autobiographical essay
Trying to make sense of computers, The Error Log.
Reply With Quote