Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Noonan
One problem that has not been addressed with any particle accelerator is the breaking of the laws of physics with matter. I have placed this question on a couple of forums and no reply.
|
What question did you ask? All I see here is an unproven claim. And please show any documentation that shows particle accelerators are breaking the laws of physics.
Quote:
|
Science can not account for the matter it accelerates.
|
Again, please show some evidence for this claim.
Quote:
|
Quantum science ‘assumes’ no time for particles because it makes a mess of the mathematics.
|
I find that hard to believe. More cites need I think.
Quote:
|
But particle accelerators use real matter to ‘create’ particles. So even though a proton is very small it is still matter and not a particle.
|
Why can't a particle have mass?
Quote:
|
First scientists ‘assume’ the protons used gain mass due to the velocity (near light speed) of over 200 times the mass of a proton. So they are happy to use general relativity to explain the gain of mass.
|
You seem to use the word assume a lot. You do realize that scientists have been using particle accelerators for over half a century?
Quote:
|
But if you took a simple piece of paper it would be a huge distance for a proton to travel through. Using the same Laws of same points of time the proton that enters that page width is not the same proton that leaves the page width.
|
The scientists at CERN aren't trying to put particles though paper. Of course, you could show what equations you're trying to use to match a piece of paper to a head on particle collision.
Quote:
|
In order for it to be the same proton time must be allowed into the mix of equations to describe the movement of the proton around the particle accelerator.
|
Ah, I get it now. You claim above that scientists don't use time in their calculations, and set up a false scenario showing that the scientists are wrong. Sloppy science.
Quote:
|
Within a year this particle accelerator will be five to seven times more powerful than anything ever built on earth. There is no explanation for why any particle accelerator works apart from the fact that they do.
|
This has to be the most absurd comment yet. As I mentioned above, scientists have been building accelerators for over 50 years. Particle accelerators didn't just pop up from nowhere, they were designed and built with a specific purpose. And what would be the point of building something if you have no idea what it's capable of doing?
Quote:
|
Even more strange is in line with the increased rate of universe expansion there is an increased rate of performance being delivered from the older particle accelerators.
|
I think this might be a new definition for non sequitur.