View Single Post
  #453 (permalink)  
Old 27-August-2008, 10:53 AM
Disinfo Agent Disinfo Agent is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,133
Arrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken G View Post
The point we have been debating since the inception of the thread is whether female accomplishment discrepancies in math and analytic logic that we find in school and careers are due to innate genetic differences, or are due primarily to our society. It's not an issue as insignificant as "labeling", it is an issue of whether or not we are hamstringing our women via our societal norms, and then turning around and blaming their physiology for that. Is that not what we are talking about? Am I reading the wrong thread here?
You are definitely reading the right thread, and reading it well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by timb View Post
You don't like the British National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles 2000 (NATSAL II) that found 2.6% of men reported having sex with a man in the previous five years? There are numerous other recent mass population studies that find numbers well below 10%.
I am not familiar with any of those, so I won't comment on them specifically.

If you wish to discuss the percentages of homosexuals in human populations and the difficulties in estimating such percentages reliably, please open a new thread.
__________________
"A witty saying proves nothing" Voltaire.
"All your bias are belong to us" Ara Pacis.
Reply With Quote