Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken G
Look at 'em. Yes, it was your imagination too. (Of course, had I actually claimed that sexual harassment occured, I would certainly have used a more pointed descriptor for Paxton than a "clown".)
|
Oh realllyyy?!
Well, ok. I will do what you asked. And I will Look at your posts.
Here are a few examples of what
YOU Said KenG.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken G
3) If any of those girls were students at his school, his behavior would likely constitute sexual harassment. If a guy at a frat tries to get you drunk, that's bad enough, but when it's the president of your school...
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken G
I won't get any more facts, so I can go only with what is on the table now-- and the picture painted is perfectly well matched to my deductions about it.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken G
If you can't see the sexual harassment dimension in that situation, and what distinguishes it from "drinking with several people" if those women are students (as I clearly stated before), then I'm afraid I don't have time to explain it to you. Consider yourself completely uninformed on the issue, which may go a long way to explain your rationalizations above.
|
Guess I need to check my imagination meter huh?
Or better yet... KenG, I suggest you try remembering your own claims rather than constantly and consistantly accusing others.
This is similar to your "Apology" to me a few posts back in which you apologized by claiming that I "confessed you were right" and claiming I misled you with misunderstandings and it was all my fault.
Which brings us to this little doozy right here:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken G
I find it strains credibility that you view the replacements I bolded as anything but a blatant obfuscation, but if you think it is "imagined", I guess there's not much I can say other than-- ask someone else.
|
Blatant obfuscation and imagination?
KenG you have amazed me during your participation in this thread.
I will be certain, from here on out, to try very hard to avoid debating topics with you.
These posts bear remarkable similarity to CT and HB mentality, in which your posts use clear accusation and insult and ad hom attacks whenever your argument fails.
Your mind boggling "Apology" by blaming me and claiming I confessed to something to which I made no such confessions demonstrated clearly that your posts seek to confuse and obfuscate- and once your posts have done that, the next posts supplies accusations that it was the other party imagining and obfuscated and even rationalized.
What a tactic! I am done with you.
I'm done with you KenG and although I will not be putting you on Ignore or anything, I will be certain to supply my respects and debate to those more worthy of my time.
Because whatever respect I had previously for your posts - is shattered.