View Single Post
  #615 (permalink)  
Old 03-September-2008, 06:50 AM
Neverfly's Avatar
Neverfly Neverfly is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth, Texas
Posts: 13,391
Send a message via Yahoo to Neverfly
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken G View Post
Yes, you do, and then check the meaning of the word "if".
Obfuscation?
By making the claim across a minimum of four posts - but by not saying it directly- you allowed yourself the escape hatch in case you couldn't prove it.
Problem is...
You didn't obfuscate this one very well:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken G
If you can't see the sexual harassment dimension in that situation, and what distinguishes it from "drinking with several people" if those women are students (as I clearly stated before), then I'm afraid I don't have time to explain it to you. Consider yourself completely uninformed on the issue, which may go a long way to explain your rationalizations above.
Face it KenG- your tactic of allowing yourself an escape hatch met with miserable failure.
Seriously, what do you take me for? I'm not falling for it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken G View Post
I'm well aware of what I said, and I'm well aware that I did not claim that was sexual harassment, unless one of those women was a student at that school.
Escape hatch with a clarifyer...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken G View Post
That's what I said then, and now, as even your above quotes show quite clearly. I know you cannot get this, I'm saying it in case anyone else is reading this and was wondering about your accusations.
And here's the part where your post blames me again.

Do you ever- ever at all?- accept responsibility for just being simply wrong?

You made the sexual harassment charge repeatedly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken G View Post
To clarify to anyone else reading why I would use those words, they describe Neverfly's description of a photo of a college president obviously pouring beer down a young woman's throat, by the words "a man sitting on a boat". Yes, I still see that as blatant obfuscation. Anyway, obviously you will never see these facts as true, so there's no need to continue.
Accusation of obfuscation that's unfounded at best- and I already covered it twice.

You're right about one thing. Not much need to continue. You have invented your facts and will repeatedly re-invent them as needed.
Reply With Quote