Wow 7 hours later and no supporting documentation for QGP occurring anywhere else? Still just the same tired line about how many times nature has conducted the experimental program, you've got to be kidding me people? Did you try to find any documentation? Quick lesson in linguistic logic is needed here obviously.
1. Fruit grows on trees. << True
2. All trees are fruit trees. << False
3. In an orchard all trees are fruit trees. << True, while possibly not technically a true statement the speaker makes an obvious attempt to qualify his/her statement, with no intention to deceive.
1. Cosmic Ray collisions with planetary and solar bodies often release more energy than the collisions in the LHC. << True
2. The area of the Earth's surface is about 5x1018 square centimeters, and the age of the Earth is about 4.5 billion years. Therefore, over 3x1022 cosmic rays of 1017ev or more, equal or greater than the LHC energy, have struck the Earth's surface since its Formation. << True, from the above orchard example speaker has made it clear that this is a reasonable guess based on the science and math available with no intention to deceive.
3. Nature has already completed about 1031 LHC experimental programmes since the beginning of the Universe. << False, the speaker uses no qualifying statements and the purpose is to deceive.
No previous statements even of a theoretical nature suggest that QGP is created during a cosmic ray collision with a planetary or solar body. Creating QGP is a stated goal of one of their experiments. No previous statements suggest that "real space" can be unlocked to access 5th/6th/7th dimensions from cosmic ray collisions with planetary or solar body another stated purpose of their experiments.
When one of you comes up with a source stating. "QGP is theorized to be created in cosmic ray collisions with planetary or solar bodies." Then I eat my words, suck it up and apologize, like the big boy I am.
cjameshuff go look up what QGP is and when and where it is theorized to occur.
Prove me wrong with a source. In the course of posting on this thread I have learned to substantiate my positions and verify my sources. I have posted those sources all of which are reputable in each of my threads. This is not a "who can shout loudest wins" discussion.
Bonus:
I say there is an invisible elf in my backyard. << True, previous statements from Van Rijn have verified that he lives in a fantasy land. All posts are consistent and the writer has shown no intention to deceive us on this point.