How much of this is uncertain and how much of it is just uncertain in Your Mind?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren Platts
Proof #1: It is uncertain whether the universe exists in 5 or 6 dimensions.
|
Huh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren Platts
Proof #2: It is not uncertain that any mBH's produced by the LHC will have velocities less than Earth's escape velocity (this would be an unprecedented event in the history of the Earth).
|
Even if they don't- it's irrelevant.
MBH's lack the necessary mass and behavior to do any kind of damage.
Currently, Cosmic rays have already done this "experiment" naturally and although most do have the velocity to escape- Not All Of Them Do Have it.
This is all ASSUMING that ANY mBH's are made.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren Platts
Proof #3: It is uncertain whether Hawking radiation is a real phenomenon.
|
Not very uncertain. And even IF Hawking Radiation is invalid, these MBH's, again, lack the mass to actually gobble up anything. HTis is just another of your many misconceptions.
Imagine that you are in a spacecraft name "MicroBlackHole" and you are assigned the task of running through the asteroid belt without steering and hitting as many asteroids as possible. Your minimum quota is at least ten.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren Platts
Proof #4: It is uncertain whether metastable mBH's will grow exponentially.
|
Actually, no it isn't. See above.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren Platts
Proof #5: It is uncertain whether the extrapolation of the semiclassical approximation to the behavior of multidimensional mBH's deep within the quantum gravitational realm is valid.
|
Actually no it isn't. It may be in your mind and lack of understanding though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren Platts
Proof #6: When the chain of events that would have to happen to destroy the world is looked at link-by-link, there is no single showstopper that can prevent the world from being destroyed.
|
There is a great multitude of showstoppers with each point you make. In other words- your supposed uncertainties are not really uncertainties.
It's far more likely that they reinforce eachother as a matter of fact.
Given one factor of odds, then add in another factor of odds- in which the odds are 1/a much much much much much bigger number than a trillion (like you tried using trillion out of one before)and the chain of events has to be in the ONE each time- in a line- one after another- throughout the entire chain- in which you then have a Big Fat Maybe.
Sounds the same as your burrito fart to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren Platts
Corollary: When the subjective probabilities for each event are multiplied, the product is a much, much greater number than the probability that a burrito in a microwave will destroy Mother Earth.
|
Wrong.
It's much much much much lower. See above.