View Single Post
  #1275 (permalink)  
Old 22-September-2008, 05:07 AM
Warren Platts Warren Platts is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,680
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Teleology

Needs Complete Rewrite

The author has learned to use some buzzwords correctly, but has no sense of what final cause and teleology are about.

What are you going on about now?
The odds of the LHC destroying the Earth are essentially ZERO and you are trying to spout your nonsensical GUESS about how much MONEY the planet is worth.
The point is that the value of Planet Earth is essentially infinite. Not only do you do not understand probabilities, you do not understand the nature of value or risk. Sorry.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverfly
Even if the LHC does create a MBH, we are not Reliant on Hawking Radiation to get rid of it. That's just a bonus. Add to that that so far, Hawking radiation seems consistent. It's not unsupported- just not yet "proven."
In order to "get rid of it", we are indeed dependent on Hawking radiation. The whole astrophysical argument is that even if we can't get rid of mBH's through Hawking radiation, having millions of mBH's floating around within one's planet is harmless. Doesn't seem like a good idea to me. . . .

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverfly
You clearly have not been paying attention though because what I said was as simplistic as it gets.
Yeah, constantly chanting "YOU'RE WRONG YOU'RE WRONG YOU'RE WRONG YOU'RE WRONG" ad infinitum is pretty simplistic, I'll grant.
Reply With Quote