View Single Post
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-October-2008, 06:45 AM
RobA's Avatar
RobA RobA is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 247
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rcglinsk View Post
Please elaborate. You sound like you've started off on a great foot, but why do those ratios matter? What is the significance?
The BB says that the initial energy would have congealed into individual particles - protons, aka Hydrogen ions (later to become Hydrogen atoms). As the universe cooled, some of these would have collided together, sometimes sticking together to form Helium and Deuterium (and some Lithium). For various reasons, nothing heavier would have been formed , which was a BIG problem for the BB until Hoyle (who, coincidentally, always hated the BB) figured out that heavier stuff would have been formed inside stars. Stars also generate negligible amounts of Helium (compared to expected BB quantities), and would consume any deuterium.

So, basically all the Hydrogen, Helium and Deuterium we can see would have come from the BB. But - and this is the thing - we also know from experiments here on Earth how likely Hydrogen is likely to fuse into Helium/Deuterium. Applying that to expected conditions post BB means we can calculate how much Helium and Deuterium would have been formed from the primordial Hydrogen.

This was first calculated by Gamow, who came up with (IIRC) 75% Hydrogen, 20% Helium, and 5% Deuterium. This was from first principles, before observations were possible.


Quote:
Originally Posted by rcglinsk View Post
Please elaborate on what you mean by "look younger." I wonder how you know what a "young" galaxy looks like, as opposed to an "old" galaxy.

For whatever hypothesis you propose for differentiating when a galaxy is "old" versus "young"
Take a look at the Hubble Ultra Deep Field, and this article. Younger galaxies have a number of features, like they're much smaller, more irregularly shaped, etc. From the HubbleSite:

Quote:
"While blue light seen by Hubble shows the presence of young stars, it is the absence of infrared light in the sensitive Spitzer images that was conclusive in showing that these are truly young galaxies without an earlier generation of stars,"
Back to work - I'll get to the rest later