View Single Post
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 04-October-2008, 02:06 AM
rcglinsk rcglinsk is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 136
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nereid View Post
Just this one, very quickly ...

It's not science, and is quite blunt about it.

There's an interesting thread in the JREF Forum's Science, Mathematics, Medicine and Technology section, called Plasma Cosmology - woo or not. The thread's extremely long, but in the end the conclusion is stark: "electric universe theory"* is anti-science.

Huh?!?!?

I'll quote the key part, because it's so remarkable:

In other words, this so-called theory rejects, by fiat, the theory of General Relativity (GR).

Note well: GR is "not accepted" not because it has been tested and a fatal inconsistency between theory and observations clearly demonstrated; nor is GR rejected because it is incapable of being tested ... GR is rejected because, well, just because.

There's more, of course, such as the assumption that "the universe is nearly all plasma", and the astonishing failure of logic in the conclusion from this assumption; if you want to present, and defend, this anti-science, please start a new thread in the ATM section.

* "Plasma Cosmology" is, to all intents and purposes, the same as "electric universe theory"
I didn't say anything about that. I talked about the Earth's magnetic field arising by Earth being an element in an electric circuit. Does that violate general relativity? Or do you have to extrapolate from scale to scale to scale to produce a contradiction to GR?

Also, The EU folks agree with you fundamentally

http://www.thunderbolts.info/thunderblogs/guest.htm

How does GR explain the changes in how a pendulum swings when it's under a lunar eclipse?