Quote:
Originally Posted by Neverfly
You're grasping at straws again, as well as slathering them across in other threads totally unrelated to the LHC discussion.
|
What do you honestly think? The arguments for the safety depend on a lot of theory, don't they? Yet that theory depends in turn on the underlying scientific paradigm. Yet it appears that whole edifice could get overturned any day now. If we're going to "bet the Planet", don't you think we should have firmer foundations upon which to build our safety arguments?