Quote:
Originally Posted by speedfreek
Completely correct!
Your notions are not weird at all, you are describing what cosmologists call the angular diameter - redshift relationship.
If we take the most extreme example, the highest redshift galaxy we have detected is a z=6.96 galaxy whose light has been travelling for nearly 12.9 billion years. That galaxy has an angular size (how large it looks) that puts it at an original distance of around 3.5 billion light-years away, when it emitted the light we are now seeing.
If we look at a "closer" galaxy, with a redshift of "only" z=1.4, the light from that galaxy has only been travelling for 9 billion years, and the galaxy has an angular size that puts it at around 5.7 billion years away when it emitted the light we now see.
The higher redshift z=6.96 galaxy is a lot dimmer but is also a lot larger than the lower redshift z=1.4 galaxy, as it was a lot closer to us when it emitted its light than the z=1.4 galaxy was.
Here is a link to a website that may help you get to grips with this.
The Distance Scale of the Universe
And for a more technical description of the angular diameter - redshift relationship:
Observational Cosmology: World Models and Classical Tests |
A quote from your last link...
Quote:
|
Linear development of perturbations won't cut it to clump matter fast enough; there is something major here that we don't know about making galaxies.
|
And, I hesitate to do this here, because
speedfreek has posted quite a few of these kind of 'supposed' mainstream expansion scenarios, and none of the "Pro's" have jumped in to correct any of them, BUT as soon as I show the following, that will, IMHO definitely happen...
And, this goes straight to the OP's...
How can the big egg be inside the small egg?
Quote:
If we take the most extreme example, the highest redshift galaxy we have detected is a z=6.96 galaxy whose light has been travelling for nearly 12.9 billion years. That galaxy has an angular size (how large it looks) that puts it at an original distance of around 3.5 billion light-years away, when it emitted the light we are now seeing.
If we look at a "closer" galaxy, with a redshift of "only" z=1.4, the light from that galaxy has only been travelling for 9 billion years, and the galaxy has an angular size that puts it at around 5.7 billion years away when it emitted the light we now see.
The higher redshift z=6.96 galaxy is a lot dimmer but is also a lot larger than the lower redshift z=1.4 galaxy, as it was a lot closer to us when it emitted its light than the z=1.4 galaxy was.My Bold
|
This will show how disconnected from reality this whole expansion from a 'point' really is!
How did the High Z galaxy (Whether it is a Dwarf/Spiral/ or Elliptical) "Pass" the lower Z galaxy???