View Single Post
  #1483 (permalink)  
Old 26-October-2008, 12:46 PM
Neverfly's Avatar
Neverfly Neverfly is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth, Texas
Posts: 13,391
Send a message via Yahoo to Neverfly
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warren Platts View Post
Go ahead and pull your own numbers out of wherever. At least I provided a justification for each number I offered.

I'm afraid that you're afraid to go into "probability mode" as John Ellis put it. Because once you try to quantify the risk--you lose. . . .

ETA: that goes for you too, Neverfly.
No. What You Do Not understand is that the factors involved to calculate a probability are gignormous. Either way, the pcatastrophe is still vanishingly small.

The last time I tried doing that, I left none of my justifications and it came out to like 118. That was before I learned that most black holes (If Made At All) will shoot into space.
Plus, it's ironic, that you tried factoring in a supposed 9% of 15 physicists that disagreed with Hawking, but you did NOT factor in a number for how many physicists disagree with string.

You're pulling numbers out of a skunks rectum and trying to spray Elizabeth Taylor on them and pass them off on us.

No, Warren Platts, I am not going to play your little game. Neither you, nor I, are qualified to 'calculate' out the odds. Least of all you. Considering your extreme bias while you PRETEND to be fair.

Your pcatastrophe is nonsense. Now you are daring others to play with nonsense too.
Get over it.
Reply With Quote