That video is indeed very hard to see.

Here's another question, was the shot of Armstrong's jump taken with the film camera or the video camera?

If it was the video camera, wasn't it being broadcast live? in which case it couldn't be reversed. (Of course, the HB's just say it was a rebroadcast of a previously recoded film though.)

But in any case, this is another example where I ask "why even bother in the first place?" The difficulties and chances of fakery being discovered are so high in such a shot that it's better just to not do it at all.

And if NASA was so good at getting it to look right, why didn't they do it more often; you know, in order to show more "proof" that they really went there?

It's just ill-logic.

__________________
...And that, my liege, is how we know the Earth to be banana-shaped. --Sir Bedevere