Total Science wrote:

“I'm still waiting for someone to answer the opening question.”

OK.

“Question: Why do people ignore peer-reviewed science?”

??? They don’t. They simply arrive at different conclusions than you as to the possible significance of the material. It has already been pointed out to you that there is no connection between a postulated early expansion of Ganymede by a couple of percent at best and your attempt to promote an expanding Earth. Most E.E. ideas I’ve encountered conject an expansion of 30% to 40%. Worse yet, they rely upon unproven and rather fanciful mechanisms.

Should you place on the table a specific mechanism (which does not invoke hand waving), you’re likely to receive more specific criticism.