Quote:
Originally Posted by Torsten
Reading through the thread, I noticed that at least on of the posters does not have access to Science. I'm working at home today, and I happen to subscribe to this journal, so that's where I went first. I notice that the article is not a peer-reviewed paper as you implied in several posts
|
Add another non-Science-subscriber, and thanks for exposing that disingenuouity. How can any of us that do not have access to such articles now trust that the quotes from them are not taken out of context, or presented to support something more than the authors would support?