View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 19-November-2008, 02:06 AM
Gsquare Gsquare is offline
Established Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 757
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by sabianq View Post
not really,
Fermilab and CERN have been using accelerators for making, storing and colliding antimatter for over twenty years.

while it is true that not much Antimatter is produced, and the cost of the production is really high, Antimatter is in fact stored in vacuum and magnetic confinement fields this keeps the antimatter from coming in contact with normal matter.

http://www.matter-antimatter.com/antimatter_storage.htm


http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2000/ast29may_1m.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penning_trap


http://helios.gsfc.nasa.gov/qa_gp_tp.html#antim


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Penning_trap


http://www.engr.psu.edu/antimatter/

http://van.physics.uiuc.edu/qa/listing.php?id=1173
Good post, Sabiang....most folks ARE unaware that antimatter storage is well developed as you pointed out .....and these references give some good background ...
Positrons are regularly used in medical PET scans (Positron Emission Tomography) and the like.

BTW, also not so well known is the fact that the Pentagon in the 1980's was interested in developing antibeam weapons, especially space based ..and even antimatter bombs which had the perceived advantage of small size and being 'clean' .....you don't hear much about it today because of the 'political correctness' stuff...but it is still going on.


Also, it may interest you that the largest known antimatter 'beam' is actually spueing out from (close to) the galactic center and evidenced by a large cloud of antimatter (gamma spectrum) about 10,000 L.Y. across around the galactic center. Only recently has its apparent source been tied to x-ray binaries that cluster in that vicinity.....
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/...er_binary.html

G^2
.
.
Reply With Quote