Thread: Element 115 and anti-gravity?
View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 25-November-2008, 05:57 PM
Rex84's Avatar
Rex84 Rex84 is offline
Established Member
  
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: I live on the surface of the planet along with the rest of humanity digging through the dirt.
Posts: 130
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by mugaliens View Post
Have you considered looking up element 115 on Wikipedia? If you had, you would have found an entry for Ununpentium.

Whether or not an elment is viable has nothing to do with its galaxy. Rather, it has everything to do with its nuclear/atomic/molecular structure.

As for "anti-gravity emitters and such," references to those sorts of things belongs in the ATM (Against the Mainstream) section.

Welcome to the board, consider looking at the links I provided, and have fun!

By the way, I answered "YES," as it's viable for 87.5 ms for isotope 288, and 32 ms for isotope 287.
Splendid!! You are veritable fountain of information! Well I know the heavier elements should be in the older galaxies most of the data I show is that our galaxy just has not been around long enough to produce it yet.

Okay here I go to those sights! Thanks so much!!
__________________
"When the first ship arrived, we were all on the ridge with weapons pointed skyward, then the first beam cut a portion of the ridgeline from under us." "First 3 troops broke ranks, then 8...then the second beam vaporized an armored troop carrier--soon after that we were all running in terror." Evolutionary War I November 11, 2011 at 11:11am Yosemite National Park