Quote:
Originally Posted by toothdust
Well considering that we don't KNOW that life spontaneously began here on Earth, all genesis theories should be given equal thought. The abiogenesis hypothesis is too speculative to call it "mainstream" in my opinion. We only assume life began in a soup pond here on Earth. Crick might have something to say about that.
|
I don't KNOW that I'm not dreaming all this while strapped up in a straight jacket and drooling on myself in a padded room./
Prove to me that I'm not.
Toothdust, we can make rational educated guesses as to what is the most likely, based on evidence.
What you choose to believe is your own choice.
I choose to not believe at all.
As far as if Abiogenic life is Mainstream- what's your point?
If life did not originate on Earth- it MUST have originated SOMEWhere, so how did it originate THERE?
Click* hello.
Endless Loop: See entry under Loop, Endless.
It's speculative but rationally so. The abiogenic origin theory is sound and well supported by bio-chemistry. Very Well Supported.
The only real issue is: Did life originate here once or many times? Because it's actually pretty easy for life to form...