View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 29-November-2008, 07:06 PM
mugaliens's Avatar
mugaliens mugaliens is offline
Order of Kilopi
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 12,286
Default

No experience with either.

So far as Blu-ray output goes:

I have experience with Adobe Premier Pro CS4 ($800), and have played around with Premiere Elements 7 ($140). I have also worked extensively with Pinnacle Studio 9. Pinnacle Studio 12 comes in three versions, but only Enhanced ($100) and Ultimate ($130) support Blu-ray authoring.

I would say if you want to go with Adobe, go for Premiere Pro CS4. If $800 is beyond your budget, go with Pinnacle Studio 12. While it's great, many of the transitions and effects appear chincy. In professional video, you rarely see that sort of "glitz." The next time you watch a film, you'll notice absolutely none of it. Rather, all professional film does simple cut transitions.

Caveat: I cannot compare either with Cyberlink's or Sony's software, so don't consider the above as a push away from either. I simply have no experience with either.

If you want an informed opinion, check out PC Magazine's collection of Video Editing Software Reviews.

But for the creme-de-la-creme, go to the 2009 Video Editing Software Product Comparisons chart by TopTen Reviews.

Some caveats:

1. I'd stay away from Corel. Their customer support is incredibly lousy.

2. Easy Media Creator is bloatware something fierce. So is Nero.

3. Both CyberLink and Sony Vegas are towards the left, with higher overall scores and seem to have more features.

4. The review says that CyberLink will not capture from AVCHD, and will not write to AVCHD disc. Something you may wish to consider.

After reviewing all, Sony Vegas gets my nod. However, I'd have to play around with several before I made a decision one way or another.
__________________
If I set the budget, we'd have Ares and more. Unfortunately, I don't set the budget, and Ares is just too expensive and too far out for us to accomplish our goals within the budget we were given.

If we halt the ISS, all versions of Ares, and transport Orion and Altair aboard DIRECTv3's Jupiter family of Shuttle-Derived Launch Vehicles, we just might make it back to the Moon by 2020.
Reply With Quote