View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-December-2008, 03:54 PM
hhEb09'1's Avatar
hhEb09'1 hhEb09'1 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NC USA
Posts: 10,765
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mugaliens View Post
According to these tests, PAQ8P and STUFFIT 12.0b both enjoy a respectable 25% compression ratio, and PackJPG2.3 pu is close behind, at 25%.
18%?
Quote:
So what's the solution? How do we eliminate the scourage of compression artifacts? Simple - have all cameras, handheld, profession, space-boarn, whatever, take images and temporarily store them in bitmap format (lossless), while performing ongoing background compression (time isn't critical) to achieve a better than 7 to 1 compression for long-term storage and transmittal.

Then, use that amazing processing power of computers (workstations/desktops) everywhere, to perform on-the-fly decompression for viewing, and re-compressing for subsequent storage after image manipulation (such as cropping or adjustment of colors).
I was under the impression that this was the way things were done now, mostly. Well, maybe not 7 to 1--but that 7 to 1 is related to that special illustration, which itself is a reconstructed bitmap. Depending upon how the reconstruction went, there may not be new information and the subsequent re-compression can take advantage of that--and some programs may be more compatible with that particular type of reconstruction.
Reply With Quote