Antimatter annihiliation would produce enough energy for interstellar flight, but it has several disadvantages. Firstly antimatter is extremely difficult and expensive to create; it would take millions of years at the current rate of production to make enough for a flight to Mars, let alone a flight to the stars.
Secondly much of the energy released in an antimatter reaction is released as gamma-rays or neutrinos- neither of which can be reflected by any known material, so they can't be used to produce thrust.
In short the antimatter option is very, very inefficient and costly, unless several highly speculative advances in technology are possible.
Fusion power is barely powerful enough to get to a distant star in a reasonable time- but if you want to slow down at the destination, you need to take vast amounts of fuel with you. So it is effectively impractical as well.
Gourdhead's idea of beamed power seems to be one of the few feasible schemes for interstellar travel, but it has some drawbacks too. The beam can only accelerate a ship; to decelerate at the destination you need on-board fuel, or another power beam/particle beam already at the destination to slow you down. Basically you need a beam station at every departure and arrival point. Secondly- a minor nitpick- the ship should be symmetrical, around the centre of thrust- otherwise the beam would tend to push the craft sideways, out of the beam, losing power.
|