Quote:
Originally Posted by forrest noble
Nereid,
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nereid
[...]
I note that my third question here - has the underlying 'vortex theory of (pushing) gravity' been published in a relevant, peer-reviewed journal? If so, please provide a reference - remains unanswered.
|
[...]
As to the second question. With ATM theories, no highly respected journals will touch them. Today the internet is the best bet since many practitioners know little more than what they were taught. Young practitioners might be willing to give it a crack but their job ofter depends on their constriction to dogma. My technical Paper has interested some online publishers so my expectation is that within a few months it will by published. I'm sure you realize that this theory is unrelated to present day perspectives and beliefs. That's neither good nor bad. It's just a fact. The fact that your reading my material means that not only you are critical of ATM ideas, it might mean that you have a skepticism of all assertions. BA says that he's a skeptic. Based upon some of his writings I would not be surprised if that skepticism did not extent beyond ATM ideas, which in my opinion is a laudable characteristic of all thinking people.
respectfully, forrest |
(addressing only one, of two question/answers; the other I'll cover in a separate post)
So the answer to my question is "No".
Two follow-on Yes/No questions, just so that I don't (yet again) misunderstand ...
Has a paper containing the underlying 'vortex theory of (pushing) gravity' been submitted to a relevant, peer-reviewed journal?
Has a paper containing the underlying 'vortex theory of (pushing) gravity' been prepared, in a form that adheres to the style, format, layout, etc requirements of a relevant, peer-reviewed journal (e.g.
ApJ's)?
respectfully, Nereid