Quote:
Originally Posted by dgavin
Warren, Problems I see with equations as you presented them.
There is no Accounting of Gravity, Distance, and atom motions all of which are likely to prevent atoms from even impacting or getting close the the black hole. Your equasions seem to assume that all matter that is close will be pulled in and absorbed. That isn't the case at the atomic/quantum level.
|
I do in fact take into account gravity (it's too weak to be a major factor), distance (less than an atomic diameter) and atom motions (I calculated that iron atoms vibrate with an average velocity of 2500 m/s). I also don't assume that all matter that is close will be pulled in and absorbed. I assume that matter that directly collides with the mBH will be absorbed.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dgavin
There is no Accounting for Objects in the process of being captured, from preventing other objects from getting close. Atom1, in a death spiral into BH, still has electron shell, which deflects atom 2 away from itself and the BH.
|
The gravitational event horizon is much smaller than an atomic nucleus, so you won't have atoms gravitationally orbiting the mBH in some sort of a death spiral that knocks other atoms out of the way.
ETA: the one thing that would inhibit the influx of matter would be the radiation released by matter as it gets sucked into the mBH. This is the Eddington limited scenario, which has it's own problems.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dgavin
Overall the equasions need to be reworked to account for the Probability of atom-atom collisions based on temperature first, (modified to remove the electron shell repulsion of normal matter)
|
This I did: the probability that a surrounding atom will run into the mBH within 1 second is 1. It's like being an asteroid in a solar system where all the objects don't obey Newton's laws, but instead move around chaotically at 10
15c (c =the speed of light).