Quote:
On 2001-11-04 13:37, Donnie B. wrote:
Well, I don't know about anybody else, but this sounds to me like pure paranoid conspiracy-mongering.
|
I'd go with that. Questions about nagging (apparent) inconsistencies are one thing--to make a leap to cover-up and hoax are another.
Quote:
What on earth (or off it) would the point be? And if there were such a covert mission, how has it been covered up so thoroughly for so long? There would have been hundreds of people involved. This argument can also be applied to the standard "moon hoax" theory, and it's equally powerful here.
The problem is, your proposed conspirators are both too smart (clever enough to organize a huge coverup and keep it secret for 40 years) and too dumb (not smart enough to figure out whether the cabin should get hot or cold).
|
Worse, it seems that the data that he's using to "prove" his case is ... other NASA missions. Apparently, those are still believed to have happened--but the participants don't seem to have known anything about how they operated.
<font size=-1>[Fixed formatting of quotes]</font>
<font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: GrapesOfWrath on 2001-11-05 07:27 ]</font>