First I must apologize for the lack of response on my part. I hope those who have written in the past or have followed previous postings will forgive me.

I have finally posted a web page that contains the essential development of my Uniform Expansion Theory. Those interested may link to www.uniformexpansion.com

I thought that what I should do here is post a few of the responses to questions others have had in response to the proposed relationships.

I also will be posting some applications of the theory. The first will be rather basic, but soon I will be posting the first “good” applications of the theory. I am not sure which I will post first. It will either be to explain the energy output from quasars without resorting to black holes, or will be the significant reduction in the amount of dark matter needed for observed celestial stability.


Basic formulas: "The Ratios of Time"

With a notation standard that "1" represents the younger age of universe, and "2" represents an older age, the following ratios describe proportional relationships that change due to the expansion of space. The size of an object, or the distance between two points in an expanding space field, is D, the velocity between two points is V, the energy of an object is E, and the effect of gravity (the gravitational "constant") is G. (Coulomb's constant, which is associated with the effect of charge, matches the relationship found for the gravitational constant).

Ratios of Time
dS/dT = T (Space changes, therefore time exists)
S = T^2 (The volume of “absolute space” varies to the square of Cosmic time)
D2/D1 = (T2 /T1) ^ (2/3)
V2/ V1 = (T1/T2) ^(1/3)
E2/ E1 = (T1/T2) ^(2/3)
"G2/G1" = (T1/T2) ^(4/3)


1. Why don’t the dimensions in the "Fundamental Formula" dS/dT =T balance?

The formula describes a geometrical relationship between distance and time. Special Relativity also has a similar dimensional imbalance between distance and time. (delta t^2 = delta x^2 + delta y^2 + delta z^2). For relativity, it is the geometrical relationship between distance and time as described by the speed of light that allows the dimensional "imbalance" to become resolved. For this theory, it is the geometrical relationship between distance and time as described by the expansion of space that allows the dimensional "imbalance" to become resolved.

2. Given the above relationships, at what age from now, would an object to double in size, assuming the Universe was 6.5 billion years old? (I know this is not the accepted age, more on this later).

L2/L1 = (T2 /T1) ^ (2/3)
2/1 =(T2 /6.5) ^ (2/3)
2.828 = T2 /6.5
T2 = 18.4 billion years, (or T2 -T1 = 11.9 billion years from now.)

3. In the above example, how fast are the two points moving away from each other?

If we use a meter stick as a measurement of length, then one end of the meter stick moved one meter away in the course of 11.9 billion years. Of course, locally the meter stick will expand with the expansion of space so it is only by the establishment of an “absolute” ruler that the proposed change can be described.

More soon.

Thanks

snowflake